I've only quickly glanced at those, and I haven't followed those
discussions at all, I have to admit.
Are there any practical consequences for gecko/firefox? It doesn't look
like it would, in particular when looking at the reference
implementations being all on top of html platforms.
Axel
On 7/17/13 1:12 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
The W3C has released three RDFA-related documents, one proposed
recommendation:
HTML+RDFa 1.1:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-html-rdfa-20130625/
and two proposed edited recommendations (which contain only
editorial changes):
RDFa 1.1 Core:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PER-rdfa-core-20130625/
XHTML+RDFa 1.1
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PER-xhtml-rdfa-20130625/
There's a call for review to W3C member companies (of which Mozilla
is one) open until Tuesday, July 23 (one week from today).
If there are comments you think Mozilla should send as part of the
review, or if you think Mozilla should voice support or opposition
to the specification, please say so in this thread. (I'd note,
however, that there have been many previous opportunities to make
comments, so it's somewhat bad form to bring up fundamental issues
for the first time at this stage.)
There was one formal objection earlier in the process, whose history
is documented in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2013Jan/0057.html
-David
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
