On 3/28/14, 2:16 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
warp is Facebook's new C/C++ preprocessor, written by Walter Bright (in
D, of course). They claim build time (not just preprocessing time) of
10% to 40%.

https://code.facebook.com/posts/476987592402291/under-the-hood-warp-a-fast-c-and-c-preprocessor

I have a patch at https://hg.stage.mozaws.net/gecko-collab/rev/d6ea4c36aa65 that will change the build system to measure different phases of compiler execution. For each compile command, it essentially runs -E + -fsyntax-only + -c as separate commands and measures the results.

I'm not sure if isolating the run time of -E is sufficient to measure the performance overhead of the preprocessor. But what I do know is that the last time I ran this (a few months ago), mozilla-central's problem was in AST generation and codegen, not preprocessor. I believe -E processes were only a few ms on average (assuming SSD, which you should all be using if you have a choice - MoCo employees have a choice) and AST/codegen were an order of magnitude longer.

I encourage people to play around with this patch to measure things. Better yet, try to hook up Warp and see if it actually makes a difference. If it does, then by all means let's integrate it into the build system like we already do with ccache.
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to