On 04.06.2014 11:45, Mike de Boer wrote:
The reason CommonJS came into view was not because of it’s semantic superiority, but because of its similarity to both the XPCShell-test and Mochitest assertion styles and implementation. This way I thought we could circumvent ppl to get worried about re-inventing the wheel or something like that and view this change as an incremental step to gradually improve the blueprint overlap between the test suites in use.
I don't understand. How does using CommonJS achieve this better than making XPCShell use something based on the Mochitest API?
Dao _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
