Very cool. One quick question - is this covered in the proposal?
class Base { virtual int f( int ba, char bb ); }; class Derived { virtual int f( int da, char db ); // is this allowed and does it count like a base class function override? }; Derived d; Base* b = &d; // What is the validity of the four cases below? b->f( ba=0, bb=‘c’ ); b->f( da=0, db=‘c’ ); d.f( ba=0, bb=‘c’ ); d.f( da=0, db=‘c’ ); -- - Milan On Jun 14, 2014, at 14:07 , Botond Ballo <bba...@mozilla.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Ehsan and I would like to propose named arguments as a new feature for C++. > > We have a draft proposal paper here: > http://ehsan.github.io/namedargs/namedargs.html > > Any feedback on it would be greatly appreciated! > > (I will not be formally presenting this proposal at the upcoming C++ > standards committe meeting in Rapperswil, because we didn't have the > proposal ready in time for the pre-meeting mailing. However, I will > circulate it to committee members informally, and possibly talk to some > of them about it while I'm there. Hopefully I can then formally present > an updated proposal at the following committee meeting in November.) > > Cheers, > Botond > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform