Very cool.
One quick question - is this covered in the proposal?
class Base {
virtual int f( int ba, char bb );
};
class Derived {
virtual int f( int da, char db ); // is this allowed and does it count like
a base class function override?
};
Derived d;
Base* b = &d;
// What is the validity of the four cases below?
b->f( ba=0, bb=‘c’ );
b->f( da=0, db=‘c’ );
d.f( ba=0, bb=‘c’ );
d.f( da=0, db=‘c’ );
--
- Milan
On Jun 14, 2014, at 14:07 , Botond Ballo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Ehsan and I would like to propose named arguments as a new feature for C++.
>
> We have a draft proposal paper here:
> http://ehsan.github.io/namedargs/namedargs.html
>
> Any feedback on it would be greatly appreciated!
>
> (I will not be formally presenting this proposal at the upcoming C++
> standards committe meeting in Rapperswil, because we didn't have the
> proposal ready in time for the pre-meeting mailing. However, I will
> circulate it to committee members informally, and possibly talk to some
> of them about it while I'm there. Hopefully I can then formally present
> an updated proposal at the following committee meeting in November.)
>
> Cheers,
> Botond
> _______________________________________________
> dev-platform mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
