On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 9:17:25 PM UTC+5:45, Jeff Muizelaar wrote: > On 2013-09-11, at 9:43 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote: > > > > > On 11/9/13 14:12, Jeff Muizelaar wrote: > > > > > >> Brotli increases the window size and thus memory requirement to 4MB > > >> which is quite a bit. It's also larger than the cache size on mobile > > >> devices which is currently around 1MB so it would be interesting to > > >> see decompression speeds on small cache devices. > > > > > > That's an interesting point, which we should certainly raise with the > > developers. > > > > > >> Brotli seems to have similar design to OodleLZHLW > > >> (http://www.radgametools.com/oodlecompressors.htm) it would of course > > >> be interesting to know how it competes. > > > > > > It would, although that looks like a commercial product and thus not > > something we could adopt as part of the open Web platform, even if it > > appears to have particularly desirable performance > > > > Certainly. I just mean that it's important to compare Brotli against > compression schemes that are targeted at the same design space to see how > well it compares against it's real competition. Another candidate for > comparison is LZHAM which is basically LZMA using huffman coding instead of > range coding. > > > > -Jeff
I want the comparative study of LZMA and Brotil compression algorithms _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
