On 09/24/2014 09:32 AM, L. David Baron wrote: > Or, alternatively, it seems like the use case here would be > addressed by doing what the spec said before.
Following up more on this: the CSSWG has now resolved to *allow* (but not require) the formerly-required-by-spec prettier downscaling behavior, per the first "RESOLVED" at the top of http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0384.html I filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1072703 to cover this. Given that the main use-cases for "image-rendering:pixelated" are for *upscaling*, I don't think the optional-better-downscaling-work should block us from shipping a straightforward (& spec-compliant) nearest-neighbor implementation for "pixelated". We can add better-downscaling logic separately, in the followup bug -- though it may even arrive in the same release where we ship "pixelated" (or if not that, soon after), since as noted in my other repsonse to dbaron, it's not *too* much work. ~Daniel _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
