On 17/07/15 16:46, James Graham wrote:
On 17/07/15 04:21, Eric Shepherd wrote:
Agreed. This is about how we feel about a spec, its content, and the
design of its API, not about if or when we will get around to
implementing it. That's also something worth capturing, but they're
not the same data points at all.
I think it's the exact opposite: people want to know what features to
expect in forthcoming Firefox, they don't really care about our feelings
except insofar as the latter influences the former. I think I would have
categories like Implemented [behind a pref] in Firefox X / Under active
development / Intend to implement / Don't intend to implement. Things
that we don't know enough about to decide whether they're a good idea to
implement or not can simply be left off the list; if we have nothing
useful to say about technology X it's better to say nothing at all.
Specifying when something shipped or will ship is clearly a non-goal for
this first iteration. Plenty of resources already provide this
information, starting with caniuse and MDN.
Once we have the first iteration shipped, we can look at adding more
data points.
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
