On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]> wrote: > For anything non-AMO, the user is on > their own. >
I don't know if that would fly. As I understand it, a large part of the purpose of extension signing is to protect users from malicious add-ons that get installed by non-AMO means - sideloading, installed by other apps, and so on. If we ignore the non-AMO add-ons then we're not really solving any problems worth solving. (Caveat: I don't have access to any actual data on the numbers and types of malicious add-ons, but from what I've heard I believe this to be the case. I could be wrong.) kats _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
