People kindly pointed out to me that the plain-text forwarded message
had lost the link to Lucas's draft. Here it is:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QI5rKJSiYeD9ekP2NyCYJuOnivduC9-tqEOn-GsCGS4/edit#

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
<hst...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Hi dev-platform-people,
> while editing the clipboard API spec [1] it's sometimes been suggested
> to forget about the old slightly cranky API and start fresh. I haven't
> had much response from implementors when such ideas came up on
> public-webapps, but here's an interesting E-mail from Lucas Garron at
> Google who has drafted a document that might turn into a spec for a
> better clipboard API.
>
> I've been allowed to circulate this and ask which developers at
> Mozilla might want to be involved in giving feedback on and perhaps
> eventually implement such a draft spec. See Lucas's E-mail and the
> linked draft below.
> -Hallvord
>
> [1] https://w3c.github.io/clipboard-apis/
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Lucas Garron <lgar...@google.com>
> Date: Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:16 AM
> Subject: navigator.clipboard
> To: hst...@mozilla.com
> Cc: Daniel Cheng <dch...@google.com>
>
>
> Hello Hallvord,
>
> I'm a security engineer from Chrome who was slightly involved in
> bringing text copying to the open web in Chrome. (Daniel Cheng, CCed,
> did most of the hard work.)  After introducing copying, we punted on
> the topic of image formats, pasting, and clipboard listening, but it
> has recently come up again.
>
> At this point, I'm strongly interested in exploring the possibility of
> "getting things right" by introducing a fresh clipboard API, which I'm
> tentatively referring to as "navigator.clipboard" (although
> window.clipboard would be fine, too ;-).
>
> I know that it can be a common fallacy to start over on part of the
> web platform, but document.execCommand() has a *lot* of baggage from
> its designMode origins and it seems you yourself have wondered whether
> browsers should consider something else.
> We're seeing is a mounting desire to support more clipboard features
> on the open web, and I think now is the time to consider a
> straightforward-to-use API that is asynchronous:
> - We want to transcode image formats for security, but this would
> block a synchronous API.
> - Paste will require a permission prompt in Chrome, which is much more
> straightforward for Promise-based API.
>
> I've started a very drafty proposal, mostly focused on historical
> context and reasons to start fresh.
>
> Do you have time and interest in collaborating to adapting the
> clipboard API spec to a fresh clipboard API?
>
> There are teams at Google with an active interest (e.g. Chrome Remote
> Desktop, Google Docs) in bringing clipboard paste/listening to the
> open web whom I'd like to bring in to lead an effort from the Google
> side, but I wanted to ask you early in the process.
>
> Thanks,
> »Lucas
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to