On Thursday, July 14, 2016 at 6:51:21 AM UTC+10, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > I'd like to welcome Chenxia Liu, François Marier, and Rebecca Weiss as > peers of Firefox Data Stewardship, joining Ally and myself. I'm excited to > bring a selection of people from across the organization who are familiar > with different products and projects within Mozilla, and I hope that this > reduces the time needed for people to get review. > > As a reminder, all data collection from the Firefox products, including > changes to telemetry histograms, should be reviewed by a data steward peer > before landing. More information about Firefox data collection can be found > at https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Data_Collection > > Please bear with the new peers as they learn the routine: it may be a few > days or weeks until they are fully up to speed. > > --BDS
Welcome to the new blood! While I've got you here, can we please discuss one small details of the review process? The wiki page reads "please request approval by setting the *feedback* flag for the data collection module owner or a peer". With mozreview becoming more prevalent (and easy to use) for reviews, could we please just use the *review* flag instead? (At least for now*) Of course the data collection reviewer should only look at the data collection side, another reviewer should be nominated to look at the code. * A little bird told me that eventually the feedback flag will become a first-class citizen in mozreview. ;-) _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
