On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:03 AM, smaug <sm...@welho.com> wrote:

> On 09/21/2016 04:42 AM, Shawn Huang wrote:
>> ​Because ​Storage API needs to have SecureContext support, but currently
>> not having isSecureContext available in Workers (bug 1269052) is
>> problematic. Can we initially release the Storage API without Worker
>> support?
> That sounds a tad worrisome. Is there a reason why we can't wait until we
> have SecureContext also in workers?

I encouraged Shawn to send this to gauge people's thoughts on whether we
could ship without Worker support. It seems you're on the side of waiting
until we have SecureContext support in Workers :)
dev-platform mailing list

Reply via email to