On Tuesday 2016-10-11 14:49 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote:
> > Speaking as someone who is at best a consumer of WebIDL, what's the argument
> > for doing a snapshot at this time?
> 
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2016JulSep/0004.html
> is presumably the argument. Those pointing out this argument is flawed
> have given up on that mailing list so now they get to proceed.

The other (more important, in my opinion) piece of the argument is
that it's worth advancing things to Recommendation every so often so
that it's unambiguous that they're covered by the W3C's patent
policy.

-David

-- 
π„ž   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄒   Mozilla                          https://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
             Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
             What I was walling in or walling out,
             And to whom I was like to give offense.
               - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to