On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 10:54:11 AM UTC-4, Mike Taylor wrote: > On 10/31/16 9:16 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > On Oct 31, 2016 16:02, "Mike Taylor" <mi...@mozilla.com > > <mailto:mi...@mozilla.com>> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 10/29/16 9:21 AM, Kohei Yoshino wrote: > >>> > >>> I think now is a good time to think about navigator.buildID again > >>> Thoughts? > >> > >> > >> Seems like we'd potentially end up breaking legacy sites that sniff > > that to mean "isMozilla". > >> > > > > I suggest returning a constant value to general Web sites to avoid this > > problem. > > I think that's a good path forward. > > -- > Mike Taylor > Web Compat, Mozilla
If Gecko has no plans to remove this and conform to the spec, could someone file an issue or pull request on https://github.com/whatwg/html requesting that buildID be added to Gecko compatibility mode? https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/#concept-navigator-compatibility-mode _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
