On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On 2/2/18 11:57 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 7:49 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@mozilla.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> What you have seems fine (modulo s/Web Auth/Web Authentcation/). The
>>> first comment is just housekeeping, whereas the second comment is
>>> substantive and concerning. Phrasing it as a formal objection might
>>> result in greater attention to the seemingly significant overlap. I'd be
>>> curious what other folks here think (Marcos, Tantek, Anne, etc.).
>> I'd lean towards objecting as otherwise you might get a group of
>> people with lots of different objectives and nobody really getting
>> what they want.
> That's where we're heading at the moment.

Given that "Payments" has some history with that in the early days
(different groups trying to pull things in different directions), I
think that's a real threat that needs addressing up front.

>> (Both 1.2 and 1.3 are pretty concerning, and 1.2
>> sounds like the thing that made the Web Crypto effort somewhat
>> dysfunctional.)
> Agreed.

Also agreed (that we should make this an FO right?).

Thanks for your analysis on this Peter. That's exactly the kind of
precise feedback we need to give to help present a good case for an
objection (and the changes to address it).


dev-platform mailing list

Reply via email to