This is about the code behind about:newtab and about:home, yes? Or some
broader Activity Stream magic? Activity Stream has become kind of a fuzzy
term, to the point where I'm not sure anymore what it means.

2018-06-18 21:58 GMT+02:00 Kris Maglione <kmagli...@mozilla.com>:

> +1
>
> This should also have some memory benefits by preventing us from
> unnecessarily loading AS things into multiple content processes, like we do
> now.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 03:35:01PM -0400, Mike Conley wrote:
>
>> (posted on both dev-platform and firefox-dev. Please send replies to
>> dev-platform)
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Just sending a quick note to let you know that I've filed bug 1469072[1]
>> to
>> move Activity Stream into its own content process.
>>
>> This is something that Fission needs, but we're hoping to squeeze some
>> performance benefits out of it as well by reducing, reusing and recycling
>> various Activity Stream things since they'll all be contained within a
>> single process. It might also allow us to cache more Activity Stream
>> scripts in ScriptPreloader[2], since we can reasonably assume only trusted
>> JavaScript will be running within the Activity Stream content process.
>>
>> This work is going to be handled by my intern, Jay Lim. If you have any
>> concerns with this plan, please bring them to my attention - commenting in
>> the bug, emailing me, or responding to this thread on dev-platform is
>> fine.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -Mike
>>
>> [1]: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1469072
>> [2]: I wrote about ScriptPreloader on my blog here:
>> https://mikeconley.ca/blog/2018/05/30/firefox-performance-update-9/
>>
> _______________________________________________
> firefox-dev mailing list
> firefox-...@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/firefox-dev
>
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to