On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:13 PM L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: > > On Tuesday 2019-04-09 13:55 +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 11:32 PM L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: > > > > > > The W3C is proposing revised charters for: > > > > > > Internationalization (i18n) Working Group > > > https://www.w3.org/2019/04/proposed-i18n-wg-charter.html > > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Apr/0004.html > > > diff from previous charter: > > > https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FInternational%2Fcore%2Fcharter-2016.html&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2019%2F04%2Fproposed-i18n-wg-charter.html > > > > > > Internationalization (i18n) Interest Group > > > https://www.w3.org/2019/04/proposed-i18n-ig-charter.html > > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Apr/0004.html > > > diff from previous charter: > > > https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FInternational%2Fig%2Fcharter-2016.html&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2019%2F04%2Fproposed-i18n-ig-charter.html > > > > > > Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through > > > Friday, May 3. > > > > > > Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should > > > say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should > > > support or oppose it. (Absent specific comments, I'd be inclined to > > > support the charters, because I think the i18n work at W3C has been > > > generally effective.) > > > > Is the WG expected to continue to issue revisions to > > https://www.w3.org/TR/charmod-norm/ ? The document itself suggests > > sending comments via GitHub issues. I don't see a charter item that > > clearly covers the maintenance of this document. Should we ask for an > > item that ensures that the group is explicitly chartered to continue > > to maintain this document? > > I expect the wording at the start of section 2.1 (Normative > Specifications) that says: > > The formal documents produced by the Working Group are guidelines, > best practices, requirements, and the like. These are best > published as Working Group Notes. > > probably covers this. Or does this document not fit within that > description?
Oops. Sorry. Yes, those sentences cover it. Thanks. (I searched for the case-insensitive string "note", but somehow I managed to miss the second sentence you quoted.) -- Henri Sivonen hsivo...@mozilla.com _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
