Is there a bug on file to replace privileged code calling Cu.cloneInto()
with a dummy scope/sandbox argument (ie using that as a cheap way to do
a structured clone) and similar workarounds with this standards-based
one? And in what release cycle would it be safe to start using this in
privileged code? (we normally wait a cycle or two, I think)
~ Gijs
On 01/10/2021 10:00, Tom Schuster wrote:
(Sorry for not sending this earlier)
Summary: The structuredClone function directly exposes the structured
cloning mechanism to allow (deep) cloning of values/objects.
Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1722576
Standard: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#structured-cloning
Platform coverage: All
Preference: None
DevTools bug: N/A
Other browsers: Not yet in any other browser.
web-platform-tests:
https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/html/webappapis/structured-clone
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"[email protected]" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-platform/bbadc5ce-023f-3b80-3636-e03ed31d84cc%40mozilla.com.
