I would like to follow-up and provide more context on Firefox’s current
protections and the motivation behind phasing out all third-party cookies.

Following Mozilla’s Anti-tracking policy
<https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Anti_tracking_policy>, Firefox has been
blocking third-party cookies from known trackers by default since 2019
(see Enhanced
Tracking Protection
<https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/enhanced-tracking-protection-firefox-desktop>).
We also proposed and shipped Total Cookie Protection
<https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/firefox-tips/internet-safety-for-families-total-cookie-protection/>
(enabled by default in Firefox since 2022) which partitions all third-party
cookies in separate cookie jars per site. Firefox, therefore, already
prevents trackers from abusing third-party cookies to follow and track
individuals across the web.

Cookie partitioning, as already shipped in Firefox, is an effective defense
against third-party cookie tracking. However, other browsers have tried
other solutions, such as blocking third-party cookies entirely or using
list-based blocking. In an attempt to bring consistency across browser
engines and minimize web compatibility challenges, most browser vendors are
now interested in blocking all third-party cookies and offering partitioned
cookies as an opt-in feature (CHIPS <https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS>).
To this end, Firefox is enabling CHIPS by default for all users starting
with version 131 (dev-platform announcement
<https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-platform/CAFjL7MJpS4OpDW8XwJjsnHufQx2G1oiXc3A0BDnubq%2B3pt97DA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>)
and this thread announces the next step of prototyping the blocking of all
third-party cookies.

It is worth reiterating that the motivation behind phasing out all
third-party cookies is not additional effective tracking protection but
rather, browser ecosystem uniformity/consistency.

On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 7:46 PM Tim Huang <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Summary: Third-party cookies pose significant risks to user privacy,
> allowing trackers to monitor individuals across the web. Recognizing this,
> browser vendors have committed to phasing them out. To support this effort,
> we plan to prototype third-party cookie blocking in the Nightly channel.
> This will allow us to identify and address potential website compatibility
> issues as we move towards a broader rollout.
>
> Bug: <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1865198>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1915383
>
> Specification: https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/web-without-3p-cookies/
>
> Platform coverage: Firefox Desktop, Firefox on Android
>
> Preference: network.cookie.cookieBehavior.optInPartitioning
>
> DevTools bug: <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1895215>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1872896
>
> Other browsers:
>
>    -
>
>    Chrome: Recently, they announced that they will keep supporting
>    third-party cookies
>    <https://privacysandbox.com/intl/en_us/news/privacy-sandbox-update/>
>    but will provide an option for users to opt out of them.
>    -
>
>    Safari: Third-party cookie access has been blocked since 2020
>    <https://webkit.org/blog/10218/full-third-party-cookie-blocking-and-more/>
>    -
>
>    Edge: Microsoft hasn’t announced any plan of phasing out third-party
>    cookies
>    -
>
>    Brave: Brave has blocked third-party cookies
>
>
> --
> Tim Huang
> Mozilla
> email:[email protected]
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"[email protected]" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-platform/CAFjL7MKAE1i0%2BGHnJYSDKeCsDXFH0oAZzh0sD0V5v9DbTtKe-A%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to