CC necko

> On Jul 22, 2026, at 10:14, Martin Tuhus <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> My name is Martin Tuhus, and I am preparing a scientific paper based on 
> research conducted at the University of Oslo.
> 
> The paper examines web applications that use TLS-terminating intermediaries,
> such as CDNs and WAFs. I developed and evaluated a prototype that uses HTTP
> Message Signatures, Content-Digest, and selective field-level encryption to
> protect communication beyond the TLS intermediary.
> 
> RFC 9421:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9421.html
> 
> RFC 9530:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9530.html
> 
> I am also aware of the Signature-based Integrity proposal, which applies a
> profile of RFC 9421 to signed web resources:
> https://github.com/WICG/signature-based-sri
> 
> My prototype currently relies on a Service Worker and an out-of-band verifier.
> I am investigating whether the relevant functionality could instead be
> integrated into browsers. In such a model, the browser could verify signed
> responses before exposing them to the page, generate an origin-bound key for
> signing selected requests, and retrieve the origin's verification key through
> a trusted mechanism.
> 
> I would greatly appreciate your perspective on three questions:
> 
>  1. Is work involving RFC 9421 or RFC 9530 currently being considered in
>    Firefox, beyond the Signature-based Integrity use case?
> 
>  2. Would native verification of signed origin responses and signing of
>    selected outgoing requests be compatible with the browser's networking
>    and security architecture?
> 
>  3. When implementing HTTP Message Signatures the browser needs a public key 
> to check    the signatures. Do you have any thoughts on how the public key 
> could securely be sent from the web application to the browser?
> 
> Even a response of a few sentences would be highly valuable. With your
> permission, I may quote or summarise the response in the paper. Please 
> indicate
> whether your response represents a personal technical opinion, a team
> perspective, or an official project position.
> 
> The relevant section will be finalised on 5 August 2026, so a response before
> that date would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Martin Tuhus
> University of Oslo
> [email protected] 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "[email protected]" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit 
> https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-platform/fd429fd9-355e-48ab-9112-126deacba1e4n%40mozilla.org.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"[email protected]" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-platform/347ADF20-158D-4A67-A3A7-E0EA97A59F17%40mozilla.com.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to