Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <[email protected]> wrote:

> Kathleen Wilson wrote:
>
>> Large parts of it are
>>> out of date and the people who maintain the certificate validation logic
>>> aren't required to keeping S/MIME stuff working. In particular, it is OK
>>> according to current development policies for us to change Gecko's
>>> certificate validation logic so that it works for SSL but doesn't
>>> (completely) work for S/MIME. So, basically, Mozilla doesn't implement
>>> software that can properly use S/MIME certificates, as far as we know.
>>>
>>>
>> Is this true? Can some at Mozilla confirm or deny this statement about
>> current development policies?
>>
>
> Last I checked, Thunderbird is a product whose trademark is owned by
> Mozilla, whose infrastructure is paid for by Mozilla, and whose developers
> are Mozilla community members. And it is still a product with active
> development.
>
> So saying that Mozilla doesn't have any software that uses S/MIME is a lie.


Literally nobody said that. I said "Mozilla doesn't implement software that
can properly use S/MIME certificates, we far as we know." The key word is
*properly*. I cited two pieces of evidence in support of that.

Also, Joshua, I wish that the situation with Thunderbird was the opposite
of what it is. But, it is what it is and we have to acknowledge that.

Cheers,
Brian
-- 
https://briansmith.org/
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to