>From the information we have to date, I think the CAs that try hard to run a >conformant operation can be justifiably upset that this behaviour is tolerated.
All the best. Tim. > On Dec 9, 2013, at 4:19 PM, "Eddy Nigg" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 12/09/2013 11:12 PM, From Ryan Sleevi: >> According to https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:Communications#January_10.2C_2013 >> (see the Responses section), this CA has indicated that they do not expect >> to begin operating in full compliance to the Baseline Requirements and to >> Mozilla's 2.1 Inclusion Policy until Dec 2015/January 2016. > > Thanks Ryan - then we probably should understand what Mozilla does or intends > to do in such cases. Maybe this shows that something must be done (when we > are assuming that by today every CA is compliant already and this should not > be possible according to BR AND Mozilla's requirements). > > -- > Regards > > Signer: Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd. > XMPP: [email protected] > Blog: http://blog.startcom.org/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg > > _______________________________________________ > dev-security-policy mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
