On 24/03/15 00:59, Peter Kurrasch wrote:
> Is the proposal to limit CNNIC roots to only .cn domains or would
> others be allowed?
That's a matter for discussion. We do have some data (thanks, Richard)
from CT and other places on the prevalence of CNNIC certificates in
those scans, broken down by TLD:
cn: 481
com: 203
net: 10
xn--fiqs8s: 8 (This is 中国, .china in Simplified characters)
xn--55qx5d: 4 (This is 公司, basically .com)
xn--io0a7i: 2 (This is 网络, basically .net)
wang: 2 (This is the Pinyin (romanization) for 网, which you can see
in the .net equivalent above. Chinese internet cafes have
this character on their signs. http://icannwiki.com/.wang)
xn--fiqz9s: 1 (This is 中國, .china in Traditional characters)
This is useful in assessing the impact of any particular proposed set of
changes.
> I'm curious to know what CNNIC's perspective is on this proposal, so
> will a representative be replying in this forum?
Like anyone else, they are welcome to contribute here.
Gerv
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
