On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Anil G <[email protected]> wrote: > And finally, regrettably, Eric Mill: ". . . you should channel your > passion in the direction of the enterprise IT group -- or its political > overlords -- that are inconveniencing you and driving their users away from > secure browsers." - mate, what can I say, you've got to switch off that > paranoid psychotic movie you love playing to support your political bias > and start thinking of solutions that will actually work. It may be news to > you but my IT department didn't call the President to send teams of > military police in riot gear through the building to move us off Firefox. > They just answered frustrated users' phone calls with "Try Chrome". >
My organization, a significant government agency, just told people to stop using Chrome and Firefox (and to use Internet Explorer) for major internal applications because of their mutual decision to drop TLS version negotiation support for 1.0. I channeled my passion in the direction of my IT group, explained the security issue, and the issue is being resolved. They're fixing their servers. It helps that "use IE" is a less viable strategy than it used to be, and that Firefox is not -- as you've implied many times in this thread -- taking this action alone. Spend your energy more usefully than this thread. -- Eric _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
