| I can't think of a case either. What I'm advocating would be an expansion of Mozilla's role in the security space--something that may or may not be appropriate for me to do, with pros and cons either way.
On 08/10/15 14:27, Peter Kurrasch wrote:
> 2. Loss of visibility/consistency/input: If Mozilla decides to exit the > code signing world, the security community loses a place to share > experiences, establish policies, discuss and evaluate bad acts and bad > actors, and so forth I've never seen this go on in a Mozilla context with regard to code-signing - have you? Gerv | ||
_______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
