I think I fixed it by pasting in the  right PEM.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Stradling [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, May 9, 2016 2:07 PM
To: [email protected]; Ben Wilson
<[email protected]>
Subject: Data entry errors (was Re: Undisclosed CA certificates)

On 04/05/16 12:06, Rob Stradling wrote:
<snip>
>>> I'm aiming to produce an (automatically updated) list of CA 
>>> certificates that are known to CT but are not (yet) in SalesForce.
>
> As promised, here it is...
>
> https://crt.sh/mozilla-disclosures

This entry is currently in the "Disclosed; Unknown to crt.sh" list:
Microsoft IT SSL SHA2 - 9aa9    Baltimore       Baltimore CyberTrust Root 
Microsoft Corporation   Microsoft IT SSL SHA2 
280D03194C3141D51152AC160FD1DF675BABFBDA

However, when I search for 280D03194C3141D51152AC160FD1DF675BABFBDA in
Salesforce, it brings up a record that actually seems to be for this
certificate (which crt.sh currently shows as "Undisclosed, but disclosure is
required!"):
https://crt.sh/?sha1=948e1652586240d453287ab69caeb8f2f4f02117

The "X.509 Certificate (PEM)" field in that Salesforce record contains two
copies of the 948e1652586240d453287ab69caeb8f2f4f02117 cert.  This might be
what caused the wrong hash to be calculated.

IINM, it is (still) Mozilla's intention to eventually generate a whitelist
of disclosed intermediates, such that only whitelisted or Technically
Constrained intermediates will be trusted by Firefox.  If so, then errors of
this sort could pose a significant problem at some point in the future!

Ben: You might want to fix this record in Salesforce.

Kathleen: Is it possible to persuade Salesforce to validate the entered data
correctly, so that CAs are alerted when something like this happens?

--
Rob Stradling
Senior Research & Development Scientist
COMODO - Creating Trust Online

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to