On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Nick Lamb <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Friday, 3 June 2016 17:25:11 UTC+1, Peter Kurrasch wrote: > > Regarding use of the term "bad", what does anyone think about this as an > alternative: "furtherance of criminal activity" > > As far as I'm aware all of the following are examples of criminal activity: > > Gambling (in some but not all of the United States of America) > > Glorifying Adolf Hitler (in Germany). > > Advertising the availability of sexual services such as in-call > prostitution (United Kingdom) > > Insulting the King of Thailand (Thailand) > > Maybe you personally don't think any of the above should be permitted on > the World Wide Web. But this discussion is about the policy of Mozilla's > trust store and not about you personally, so the question becomes whether > any Mozilla users expect to be able to "further" any of these activities > using Firefox and I think the unequivocal answer is yes, yes they do. > _______________________________________________ > The original design of the WebPKI required authentication of the organization for that exact reason. If a company is registered in Germany, you probably expect it to follow German laws. If you are buying from a company, the fact that they are registered in Germany or Nigeria may affect the expectations you have for performance of the contract - and the types of assurance you would require. _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
