On 25/1/2017 1:25 μμ, Gervase Markham wrote:
On 24/01/17 06:50, Dimitris Zacharopoulos wrote:
The CA/B Forum Policy Review WG made some effort
<https://cabforum.org/pipermail/policyreview/2016-April/000272.html> to
clarify this by merging information between these sections, but there
was not enough support to proceed.
Dean's summary of the voting for ballot 167 contained the line: "It is
my understanding that the ballot proponents are preparing a revised
ballot that addresses some comments received during the voting period."
Is that still true?
Gerv
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
There wasn't enough support to proceed with these changes within the WG
to even form a ballot, so we dropped them and decided to proceed with
only minor changes. I think Ryan raised a concern that he would like the
"Name Forms" section, to remain separate. I would still prefer to keep
everything simple and aligned together with the CA Certificates, because
IMHO it is easier to configure (CA's side) and audit (Auditor's side)
the certificate profiles by looking one section of the BRs instead of many.
Dimitris.
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
