> -----Original Message----- > From: dev-security-policy [mailto:dev-security-policy- > bounces+steve_medin=symantec....@lists.mozilla.org] On Behalf Of > Gervase Markham via dev-security-policy > Sent: Monday, May 01, 2017 10:16 AM > To: mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org > Subject: [EXT] Symantec: Draft Proposal > > Here is my analysis and proposal for what actions the Mozilla CA Certificates > module owner should take in respect of Symantec. > [snip]
> Please discuss the document here in mozilla.dev.security.policy. A good > timeframe for discussion would be one week; we would aim to finalise the > plan and pass it to the module owner for a decision next Monday, 8th May. > Note that Kathleen is not around until Wednesday, and may choose to read > rather than comment here. It is not a given that she will agree with me, or > the final form of the proposal :-) > > Gerv Gerv, thank you for your draft proposal under consideration. We have posted our comments and detailed information at: https://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/symantec-ca-continues-public-dialogue .
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
