On 08/06/2017 18:47, David E. Ross wrote:
On 6/8/2017 2:38 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
On 02/06/17 11:28, Gervase Markham wrote:
Proposal: add a bullet to section 2.3, where we define BR exceptions:
"Insofar as the Baseline Requirements attempt to define their own scope,
the scope of this policy (section 1.1) overrides that. Mozilla expects
CA operations relating to issuance of all SSL certificates in the scope
of this policy to conform to the Baseline Requirements."
Implemented as specced.
Gerv
This seems self-contradictory.
How about adding only 2 words ("Nevertheless" and "also") to the second
sentence:
Insofar as the Baseline Requirements attempt to define their own scope,
the scope of this policy (section 1.1) overrides that. Nevertheless,
Mozilla expects CA operations relating to issuance of all SSL
certificates in the scope of this policy to conform also to the Baseline
Requirements.
How about the following, which seems more correct
Insofar as the Baseline Requirements attempt to define their own scope,
the scope of this policy (section 1.1) overrides that. Mozilla
thus requires CA operations relating to issuance of all SSL certificates
in the scope of this policy to conform to the Baseline Requirements.
Enjoy
Jakob
--
Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S. https://www.wisemo.com
Transformervej 29, 2860 Søborg, Denmark. Direct +45 31 13 16 10
This public discussion message is non-binding and may contain errors.
WiseMo - Remote Service Management for PCs, Phones and Embedded
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
