Hi all, Your reported BR issues is from StartCom, not WoSign, we don't use the new system to issue any certificate now since the new root is not generated. PLEASE DO NOT mix it, thanks.
Best Regards, Richard > On 11 Jul 2017, at 23:34, Ryan Sleevi via dev-security-policy > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Jonathan Rudenberg via > dev-security-policy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> On Jul 11, 2017, at 06:53, okaphone.elektronika--- via >> dev-security-policy <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Monday, 10 July 2017 08:55:38 UTC+2, Richard Wang wrote: >>>> >>>> Please note this email topic is just for releasing the news that WoSign >> new system passed the security audit, just for demonstration that we >> finished item 5: >>>> " 5. Provide auditor[3] attestation that a full security audit of the >> CA’s issuing infrastructure has been successfully completed. " >>>> " [3] The auditor must be an external company, and approved by Mozilla. >> " >>> >>> It also seems a bit strange to report item 5 "successfully completed" >> before we hear anything about the other items. How about starting with item >> 1? What are your plans voor fixing the problems? >> >> It’s worth noting that the problems have not stopped yet. There are a >> bunch of certificates issued over the past few months that do not comply >> with the Baseline Requirements issued from the new "StartCom BR SSL ICA”, >> for example: >> >> https://crt.sh/?opt=cablint&q=8BDFE4A526BFB35C8A417B10F4D0AB >> E9E1D60D28A412539D5BC71C19B46FEF21 >> https://crt.sh/?opt=cablint&q=124AAD38DAAC6B694D65F45226AB51 >> 52FC46D229CBC203E0814D175F39977FF3 >> https://crt.sh/?opt=cablint&q=9B78C78B32F4AC717B3DEFDABDACC4 >> FEFA61BFD17782B83F75ADD82241147721 >> https://crt.sh/?opt=cablint&q=AAB0B5A08F106639A5C9D720CD37FD >> B30E7F337AEBAF9407FD854B5726303F7B >> https://crt.sh/?opt=cablint&q=9DCE6A924CE837328D379CE9B7CDF4 >> A2BA8A0E8EC01018B9DE736EBC64442361 >> https://crt.sh/?opt=cablint&q=62A9A9FDCDC04A043CF2CB1A5EAFE3 >> 3CF9ED8796245DE4BD5250267ADEFF005A >> https://crt.sh/?opt=cablint&q=6A72FA5DCC253D2EE07921898B9A9B >> B263FD1D20FE61B1F52F939C0C1C0DCFEE >> https://crt.sh/?opt=cablint&q=238E2E96665748D2A05BAAEEC8BAE6 >> AFE7B7EF4B1ADA4908354C855C385ECD81 >> https://crt.sh/?opt=cablint&q=C11C00EB0E14EEB30567D749FFD304 >> 45E0B490D1DCA7B7E082FD1CB0A40A71C0 >> https://crt.sh/?opt=cablint&q=4DEF4CFD21A969E8349E4428FDEC73 >> 767C01DE6127843312511B71029F4E3836 > > > It's worth noting that, on the basis of the security audit report full > details shared by WoSign, the system that was security audited does not > comply with the Baseline Requirements, nor, as designed, can it. The system > would need to undergo non-trivial effort to comply with the Baseline > Requirements. > _______________________________________________ > dev-security-policy mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
