On 11/08/2017 00:29, Jonathan Rudenberg wrote:
On Aug 10, 2017, at 17:04, Jakob Bohm via dev-security-policy
Can anyone point out a real world X.509 framework that gets confused by
a redundant pathlen:0 in a CA:FALSE certificate? (Merely to assess the
seriousness of the issue, given that the certificate was already
Yes, the cryptography Python package:
Reading that issue, the text in comment #0 is unclear. Does the python
code reject such certificates, or somehow skip extensions and declaring
possibly invalid uses to be valid?
Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S. https://www.wisemo.com
Transformervej 29, 2860 Søborg, Denmark. Direct +45 31 13 16 10
This public discussion message is non-binding and may contain errors.
WiseMo - Remote Service Management for PCs, Phones and Embedded
dev-security-policy mailing list