Hi Jeremy, In the UK it would be class as “same as” and therefore wouldn’t be allowed to be incorporated. You can see this in the links:
Companies Act 2006: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/part/5/chapter/3 The Company, Limited Liability Partnership and Business (Names and Trading Disclosures) Regulations 2015: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/17/regulation/7/made James Burton On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 at 20:32, Jeremy Rowley via dev-security-policy < [email protected]> wrote: > Can you point to a jurisdiction that allows you to register the same name? > I've never seen an example where it's permitted. Maybe the UK? > > -----Original Message----- > From: dev-security-policy <dev-security-policy-bounces+jeremy.rowley= > [email protected]> On Behalf Of Ryan Hurst via > dev-security-policy > Sent: Friday, June 1, 2018 9:28 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Disallowed company name > > On Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 3:07:36 PM UTC-7, Matthew Hardeman wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Peter Saint-Andre via > > dev-security-policy < [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > We can also think of many business types (e.g., scammers) that would > > > love to have names like ⒶⓅⓅⓁⒺ but that doesn't mean it's smart to > > > issue certificates with such names. The authorities who approve of > > > company names don't necessarily have certificate handling in mind... > > > > > > > Indeed. Most of the government offices responsible for approving > > entity creation are concerned first and foremost with ensuring that a > > unique name within their jurisdiction is chosen and that a public > > record of the entity creation exists. They are not concerned with > > risk management or legitimacy, broadly speaking. > > > > Anyone at any level of risk management in the rest of the ecosystem > > around a business will be concerned with such matters. Banks, trade > > vendors, etc, tend to reject accounts with names like this. Perhaps > > CAs should look upon this similarly. > > re: Most of the government offices responsible for approving entity > creation are concerned first and foremost with ensuring that a unique name > within their jurisdiction is chosen > > What makes you say that, most jurisdictions have no such requirement. > _______________________________________________ > dev-security-policy mailing list > [email protected] > > https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/H8qZVRE5_iLNO8giNWdHECRPUnhWmem4t7fNC9FYfaI=?d=3yPd_yGx1m4dQz3H1uWi0wkNACGDGvIL4Z--LNoP9eDPIWeD0dhf9Ol_tFkJGBJFFgtnLt2HO_UCbFnaqQu3zUWQTHxGduRJO0a_H4yYE3qhYRX3wzvleMJ_cCcflYSP6doSbnmNReFJlR_Gjut8oNV6EnnecC1kzxXkdJG19OPUi3qjxKSp_r4Tlk3ExNNIwR3DF26nn1z6wKDyzP1siUdOGQT4oa70wTAPNZrK417n5z35ynmL65-hmQXBJkPLvbJL_UkzAgimEa4Sjh8YgHtKR2tCSas65vpsh0YyIXTny7Puzb8Hvs9uNxGPMfSyStkq2pMn3jZpzjfKsgYMMKDzdouOUktqhPACnhr6Qsx3ZdCTubWI8EkLpQsj4nYxjihAKD9mM-9LyUQGRh4mQOOQ0U4zY3qAE6fPOz-Upa5efnAlQhO0GtTkcOHiosY%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Flists.mozilla.org%2Flistinfo%2Fdev-security-policy > _______________________________________________ > dev-security-policy mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy > _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
