Jakob Bohm wrote "Each of these arguments for maximum punishment and/or maximum inconvenience for innocent bystanders is backed by a formal/legal interpretation of existing rules as making this the only possible outcome."
I'd agree - heavy-handed, strict enforcement of some rules unnecessarily punishes the larger community and harms the Internet environment. I might be wrong, but I don't believe that Mozilla or Google has an established set of "Sentencing Guidelines" or even a set of procedural rights, but maybe these are needed? And maybe we need additional criteria on whether a proposed punishment is not just balanced, but also whether it considers all of the effects (privacy, security, social, economic, etc.) on subscribers and relying parties.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
