On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 9:47 AM Vincent Lynch <[email protected]> wrote:

> Was looking for some quick clarification on interpretation of this bit:
>
> *"All certificates containing an underscore character in any dNSName entry
> and having a validity period of more than 30 days MUST be revoked prior to
> January 15, 2019."*
>
> This language refers to the TOTAL validity period of the certificate, not
> the REMAINING validity, correct?
>
> Correct.

So, for example, a certificate with a NotBefore: 2/1/18 and NotAfter:
> 1/30/19 would have to be revoked?
>

Yes.

Only certificates with a TOTAL validity of <30 days (example, NotBefore:
> 12/20/18, NotAfter: 1/19/19) would be allowed to naturally expire?
>
> Yes. The thinking here is that many organizations don't pay attention to
certificate sunsets (e.g. sha-1) until it affects them directly. By
requiring them to replace their certificates while still allowing some time
to transition away from them via 30-day duration certificates, the hope is
that we will avoid the urgent calls for exceptions we've seen with past
sunset periods.

Thanks,
>
> Vincent
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 4:19 PM Wayne Thayer via dev-security-policy <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> As you may be aware, the CA/Browser Forum recently passed ballot SC12 [1]
>> creating a sunset period for TLS certificates containing an underscore
>> ("_") character in the SAN. This practice was widespread until a year ago
>> when it was pointed out that underscore characters are not permitted in
>> dNSName name forms, and ballot 202 was proposed to create an exception to
>> RFC 5280 that would allow the practice to continue. When that ballot
>> failed, some CAs stopped allowing underscore characters in SANs and others
>> continued. Ballot SC12 is intended to resolve this inconsistency and
>> provide clear guidance to auditors.
>>
>> The sunset period defined by ballot SC12 is very short. Today Mozilla sent
>> an email to all CAs in our program informing them of this change and
>> asking
>> them to take any steps necessary to comply [2].
>>
>> - Wayne
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> https://cabforum.org/2018/11/12/ballot-sc-12-sunset-of-underscores-in-dnsnames/
>> [2]
>>
>> https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/Communications#November_2018_CA_Communication_.28Underscores_in_dNSNames.29
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev-security-policy mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
>>
>
>
> --
> Vincent Lynch
>
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to