On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:08 PM Kurt Roeckx <[email protected]> wrote: > He explained before that the module that generated the corrupt > signature for the CRL was in a weird state after that and all > the newly issued certificates signed by that module also had > corrupt signatures. >
Ah! Thanks, I misparsed that. I agree, it does seem to be clearly addressed :) _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
