Matthew Hardeman via dev-security-policy 
<[email protected]> writes:

>shall be 0x75

Not 0x71?

>If anyone thinks any of this has merit, by all means run with it.

Sounds good, and saves me having to come up with something (the
bitsort(CSPRNG64()) nonsense took enough time to type up).  The only thing I
somewhat disagree with is #3, since this is now very concise and requires "the
first 64 bits of output" you can just make it a CSPRNG, which is well-
understood and presumably available to any CA, since it's a standard feature
of all HSMs.

Peter.
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to