All, Are there any further comments? Ben On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 11:12 AM Syrine Tlili <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi: > > Our inclusion request has been in public discussion since April 7. > We have provided all requested information as a first-time root inclusion > applicant. > Kindly, we would like to move forward with our request and get your final > feedback. > > Regards. > Syrine > On Wednesday, June 23, 2021 at 10:33:41 PM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote: > >> I am pretty sure this is the correct link: >> >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=9228562 >> >> (Disregard the link to Facebook). >> >> Ben >> >> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 1:01 PM <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> We added a document with more details on TunTrust CA budget. See >>> >> https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100057252566463. >>> Regards >>> Syrine >>> >>> >>> >>> Sent from my Galaxy >>> >> >>> >>> -------- Original message -------- >>> From: Watson Ladd <[email protected]> >>> Date: 2021-06-23 6:01 a.m. (GMT+01:00) >>> To: [email protected] >>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: Public Discussion re: Inclusion of the TunTrust Root CA >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, June 22, 2021 at 12:10:43 PM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote: >>> >>>> All, >>>> TunTrust has provided an overview of its compliance infrastructure, >>>> which I have reviewed. See >>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=9226817. I'm now >>>> asking the community for further comments and responses to TunTrust's >>>> inclusion request. >>>> >>> >>> I'm not happy with the level of detail in this overview. While some >>> answers are thorough, others are not detailed enough. For example the >>> budget has no hard numbers at all. Obviously prediction is hard, but surely >>> the past 3 years of spending could be included. >>> >>> Thanks, >>>> Ben >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 8:21 AM Syrine Tlili <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi All : >>>>> >>>>> We would like to move forward with our inclusion request in public >>>>> discussion since April 7th 2021. Based on the public discussion thread [1] >>>>> and on the new section “CA/Quantifying Value” [2], we have submitted a >>>>> document in our Bugzilla case [3] that provides answers and clarifications >>>>> on our CA. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/g/dev-security-policy/c/LT_5efOFsSU >>>>> >>>>> [2] https://m.wiki.mozilla.org/CA/Quantifying_Value >>>>> >>>>> [3] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1587779 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, April 20, 2021 at 7:20:45 PM UTC+1 [email protected] >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> All, >>>>>> Kathleen and I discussed iTrusChina's and TunTrust's root inclusion >>>>>> applications this morning and agreed that we should extend the public >>>>>> discussion period and leave them open for discussion beyond April 30th. >>>>>> Meanwhile, I will work on follow-up questions for them regarding their >>>>>> added value to users vs. added risk. >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Ben >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:48 AM 'Syrine Tlili' via >>>>>> [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thursday, April 8, 2021 at 4:36:19 PM UTC+1 Andrew Ayer wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 08:20:58 -0700 (PDT) >>>>>>>> Syrine Tlili <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > We are automatically checking the CAA records for all the >>>>>>>> certificate >>>>>>>> > requests equally. We do not have affiliates and the only DNS >>>>>>>> operator >>>>>>>> > in Tunisia is the «Agence Tunisienne >>>>>>>> > d’Internet» (https://www.ati.tn/ ; https://whois.ati.tn/ ). >>>>>>>> Exception >>>>>>>> > on checking CAA records does not apply to us. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Your CPS currently lists three exceptions where you might skip CAA >>>>>>>> checking. If this is not accurate, it should be updated. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Andrew >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This section on CAA checking exceptions is now updated in our >>>>>>> CP/CPS. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Syrine Tlili >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "[email protected]" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/3b85ce38-7809-49ff-a2a3-1a9c2a936c30n%40mozilla.org >>>>>>> . >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >>> Google Groups "[email protected]" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>> https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/topic/dev-security-policy/dTTp4ZfUW34/unsubscribe >>> . >>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>> [email protected]. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/54f7f7c8-0c5f-403f-bfa1-5a82e7718cbdn%40mozilla.org >>> . >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "[email protected]" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/CA%2B1gtaaazNHsCHJ1MkUTHXMPqLHNY%2BDYqa3toTA7Ek5p7SB82g%40mail.gmail.com.
