On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 8:47 PM Corey Bonnell <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don’t quite follow why this is a step back, as it’s simply a restatement > of the status quo (i.e., no steps taken). That’s not to say there can’t be > further refinements in this area, but current language does not align with > the discussion on the associated policy thread, namely [2], where it was > stated there is a desire to align MRSP with the TLS BRs in this regard. > > Your [2] has the context and discussion - and the related policy issue that prompted it. I realize you quoted midway from the discussion, but hopefully the further discussion clarifies? [2] > https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/g/dev-security-policy/c/n1vLLXwNbuM/m/atOa5QoFAQAJ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "[email protected]" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/CAErg%3DHFRf_KYuA-zrDYbGUCzqG_5OanWf21i3v2Zqybvkqo0OQ%40mail.gmail.com.
