The proposed change to a MUST is a good one, as I understand that 
disclosing the BR method numbers of the DV methods that the CA employs is 
already a requirement as documented in the CA Required or Recommended 
Practices [1]. This change will align the two documents.

Thanks,
Corey

[1] 
https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/Required_or_Recommended_Practices#Verifying_Domain_Name_Ownership

On Tuesday, November 15, 2022 at 12:16:29 PM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote:

> All,
>
> The purpose of this thread is to discuss any concerns or suggestions 
> regarding a sentence in item 3 of section 2.2 in the Mozilla Root Store 
> Policy 
> <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/governance/policies/security-group/certs/policy/#22-validation-practices>.
>  
> In Mozilla's PKI Policy repository in GitHub, Issue #253 
> <https://github.com/mozilla/pkipolicy/issues/253>, it is suggested that 
> we replace lower case "must" and uppercase "SHOULD" with uppercase "MUST". 
>
> This sentence in MRSP section 2.2 would then read:
>
> The CA operator's CPS (or, if applicable, the CP or CP/CPS) must *MUST* 
> clearly specify the procedure(s) that the CA employs, and each documented 
> procedure SHOULD *MUST* state which subsection of 3.2.2.4 it is complying 
> with. 
>
> (See also 
> https://github.com/BenWilson-Mozilla/pkipolicy/commit/389a73615e4658b49b346aeaecbb4dd8fca0c955
> )
>
> Any thoughts or suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ben
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"[email protected]" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/fe91a19f-51a9-40fd-9b5b-4e9671b40654n%40mozilla.org.

Reply via email to