Can you share/link the Mozilla processes for verifying these
documents/ownership/etc?

On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:19 AM Ben Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Kurt,
>
> I'm moving this to its own subject line.
>
> The verification stage (prior to placing an inclusion case in the public
> discussion queue) looks at whether the CA has provided the information.
>
> Some information about equitable ownership is usually provided in the CA's
> Value Justification document. Additionally, a review of information
> available online from government sources is used to determine/confirm the
> official legal name of the entity. However, we could do a better job at
> determining the equitable ownership and corporate relationships of CAs, if
> that is what you're getting at. For instance, press releases are sometimes
> a good source of information about majority shareholders.
>
> As you observe, it can get very complicated.
>
> Ben
>
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 3:40 PM Kurt Seifried <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I think the problem is that I look at statements like:
>>
>> The person conducting initial information verification uses the CCADB to
>> check the completeness of information about:
>> the CA owner,
>> the CA's auditor,
>>
>> These are very non-trivial things to verify and prove, witness
>> Trustcor's auditor maybe or maybe not being accredited at the time of the
>> audit. Ownership is nigh impossible to prove, e.g. Corp A owns the CA, but
>> what if a majority of Corp A's (unlisted) voting shares are held by a set
>> of companies that are actually interlocking?
>>
>> I guess what I'd like to see is "HOW" not just "WHAT", e.g. HOW do I
>> validate who owns the CA? HOW is the community supposed to accomplish these
>> things?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 1:01 PM Ben Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Kurt,
>>> With regard to Mozilla's process, here is some helpful information:
>>> https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/Application_Verification#Public_Discussion.
>>>
>>> Is this the kind of information you were looking for?  If so, then we'll
>>> be copying similar text, with enhancements, over to the CCADB.org website
>>> (without the Mozilla-specific language), as further guidance.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ben
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:43 AM Kurt Seifried <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Question: Are there any guidelines for bringing up concerns or
>>>> structuring arguments/evidence both in favor and against a new CA being
>>>> included? All the web page says:
>>>>
>>>> https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA
>>>>
>>>> Mozilla's dev-security-policy (MDSP) mailing list is used for
>>>> discussions of Mozilla policies related to security in general and CAs in
>>>> particular, and for wider discussions about the WebPKI. Among other things,
>>>> it is the preferred forum for the public-comment phase of CA evaluation. If
>>>> you are a regular participant in MDSP, then please add your name to the
>>>> Policy Participants page.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:39 AM Ben Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> All,
>>>>>
>>>>> As previously announced, public discussions of root inclusion requests
>>>>> will be taking place on the CCADB public list. Public discussion of a
>>>>> request for inclusion by SERPRO is taking place there now through the end
>>>>> of the year. Here is a link to the relevant thread.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/ccadb.org/g/public/c/Mux855BsRg4/m/VVoTWfmQHgAJ
>>>>>
>>>>> Following public discussion, I will post a summary of the discussion
>>>>> on the CCADB Public list.  At that point, public discussion will move to
>>>>> this list (m-d-s-p) for a one-week "last call" period. (See Step 7 in the 
>>>>> Application
>>>>> Process <https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/Application_Process>)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Ben
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "[email protected]" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/CA%2B1gtaZSDBhOfWPb5UmrgF0bwCNC3eSD-fCY7Rqt04sEEBmLSw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/CA%2B1gtaZSDBhOfWPb5UmrgF0bwCNC3eSD-fCY7Rqt04sEEBmLSw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Kurt Seifried (He/Him)
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Kurt Seifried (He/Him)
>> [email protected]
>>
>

-- 
Kurt Seifried (He/Him)
[email protected]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"[email protected]" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/CABqVa39KC7BeSvrGvcAFQYiPQ3vktk36e3gPfew-YUB%2BSqpGcA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to