Hi Ben,
Thanks for the clarification, but I think any site that hosts CA operations 
must be in the scope of the audit.
I can't figure out an scenario as you describe where there's a successful 
audit report.
Best,
Pedro

El jueves, 29 de junio de 2023 a las 16:44:16 UTC+2, Ben Wilson escribió:

> Hi Pedro,
> If the CA has two sites, one primary and one secondary, and if the 
> secondary site hasn't been audited during the audit period, then the audit 
> letter should mention that.  
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 1:39 AM Pedro Fuentes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ben,
>> I'm a bit puzzled about how to specify the locations that "were not 
>> audited".
>> What does this mean?
>> Thanks!
>> Pedro
>>
>> El martes, 27 de junio de 2023 a las 17:37:44 UTC+2, Ben Wilson escribió:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Section 5.1 of the CCADB Policy 
>>> https://www.ccadb.org/policy#51-audit-statement-content now specifies 
>>> required audit letter content very similar to what is currently in section 
>>> 3.1.4 of the Mozilla Root Store Policy (MRSP). And so it has been proposed 
>>> that much of the current language in MRSP § 3.1.4 be removed. GitHib 
>>> Issue#239 <https://github.com/mozilla/pkipolicy/issues/239>.  However, 
>>> two items do not appear in the CCADB’s list of required audit content—(1) 
>>> locations audited or not audited and (2) auditor qualifications.  
>>> Therefore, 
>>> we are proposing the following language for the first paragraph of section 
>>> 3.1.4.
>>>
>>> --- Begin MRSP Edit ---
>>>
>>> The publicly-available documentation relating to each audit MUST contain 
>>> the information required by section 5.1 of the CCADB Policy and the CA 
>>> locations that were or were not audited. Audit reports must also contain or 
>>> be accompanied by the name of the lead auditor and qualifications of the 
>>> team performing the audit, as required by section 3.2.
>>>
>>> --- End MRSP Edit ---
>>>
>>> See also 
>>> https://github.com/Mozilla/pkipolicy/compare/bf36841af0686676f0435769db8c641d7d17dfb3..8968d9b6fedc1f94f4afa6a59ce609b759f497e6
>>>  
>>>
>>> Please provide us with your comments or suggestions.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ben and Kathleen
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"[email protected]" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/43e2c679-d96d-4ec3-9ab6-29c67b5262a1n%40mozilla.org.

Reply via email to