Gervase Markham wrote: > Now is not the time to again bring up my personal issues with various > proposals which have been made in the past; but I would comment in > general that often, while proposals have a good understanding of > security, they have a less than perfect understanding of usability.
My point is, MF isn't willing to work with these groups to come up with leading security that will benefit everyone, instead MF is more then willing to work with Verisign. I saw someone else ask this as well, but my question seems to have been overlooked by accident, so I'll ask it again. How many studies, or research is behind the EV proposal so that it doesn't end up another situation that people associate yellow as being as good as green in the long term if only a small number of sites support EV certificates? -- Best regards, Duane http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom http://e164.org - Because e164.arpa is a tax on VoIP "In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip." _______________________________________________ dev-security mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security
