beltzner wrote: > One hopes you're not serious with this. I quote from the article itself:
Several people have tried to make claims the quotes were taken out of context and the Verisign in question even issued a "correction" on his blog, but the fact remains that Versigin was really pushing it's FUD campaign at the time to push through its new business model as quickly as possible with as little input from the wider community to limit criticism from people. In fact up until the last stages of the process most people were pretty hush hush about the whole thing, and as Eddy points out only big commercial entities and browsers were invited and in turn large chunks of the internet community has been excluded (like sole proprietors, partnerships etc, and I do believe there was murmurings that Universities were also excluded under the current policies). How can this be a good thing if only large enterprises are elligible for certificates, and if Verisign and MS are so gun hoe to implement EV without fixing the current discrepancies? -- Best regards, Duane http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom http://e164.org - Because e164.arpa is a tax on VoIP "In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip." _______________________________________________ dev-security mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security
