Gervase Markham wrote:
Well, what I don't understand really, why you list the various bugs multiple times? For example bug 351756 was added to 2.0, it shouldn't appear again for 2.0.0.1 and following versions, since it was already present in the previous version...So why list it again and again? Or else I simply don't understand what you want to show with it...Version certdata.txt relative version ------- ----------------------------- 2.0.0.0: 1.37 + bug 351756 2.0.0.1: 1.37 + bugs 351756, 338552, 340183Therefore, the changes between 2.0.0.0 and 2.0.0.1 are, if the table is correct, bugs 338552 (Startcom) and 340183 (Netlock).Bug 351756, as you say, is present in both.
Additionally 338552 was added as well to 2.0 and not at 2.0.0.1 (It was the first CA added to the FF2 release actually)
-- Regards Signer: Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd. Phone: +1.213.341.0390
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ dev-security mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security
