Gervase Markham wrote:
You mean, you are not happy anymore about Geotrust/Comodo business? Regfly has no connection to Mozilla whatsoever...
Indeed not.
Well, what I meant is, that Regfly has not direct responsibility to Mozilla. They are not a CA root, therefore the parent CA is responsible for it....

I guess it depends how their business operates. If they just get details from applicants and pass them on to Geotrust and Comodo for verification, then we don't have a problem. However, if Registerfly are responsible for verifying part or all of the data, there is an increased risk that erroneous certificates could be issued.
Right! I asked previously, if you suspect if certificates were issued fraudulent or if verifications were not performed...If they were operating as an intermediate CA (compared to simple reseller), than there indeed might be an increased risk, however the parent CA still has the overall responsibility and you perhaps should discuss this issue with them. A good check would be, if CRLs are still updated and revocations still performed...I think the later might be a problem, if they ceased to function correctly (as they did with the domains).

--
Regards

Signer:      Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd.
Phone:       +1.213.341.0390
_______________________________________________
dev-security mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security

Reply via email to