On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:29:29 -0700
John Nagle wrote:

>     How can a free CA afford to validate its customers?
> 

Check out startssl.com. It's only a few cpu cycles to certify a
domain via email or html file which is the only unforgeable level of
cert. Yes security of the key needs to be paid for and by having one
browser funded CA the costs would be tiny and benefits in security and
auditing and time to fixes etc. etc. large.


>     The CA Browser Forum is tightening up standards.
> The rules on certs change July 12, 2012, and will be much tighter
> thereafter.  There will be three levels of certs - "domain control
> only", "organization validated", and "extended validation".
> "Domain control only" is for blogs.  Anything that takes a credit
> card should have at least "organization validated".  Financial
> institutions should have EV.

So. I'm guessing they are heading in the complete wrong direction and
applying the greatest award of validation to the least secure methods
of validation which only serve to causes a false sense of security and
make criminals pay a few bucks for tricking customers to ignore the
domain name. Would that be payment to the CAs by any chance. The
browsers may as well make the money themselves if they are going to
continue down this dumb road.

I guess it's not that surprising as even PCI compliance actually forces
OpenBSD servers to reduce the security of their password system.


>Anything that takes a credit card should have at least "organization 
>validated".

Can you actually think of a reason for that. Considering how little time
and money it takes to set up a new organisation. Extended is next to
useless too.

And there are major down sides such as:

False sense of security. 
Penalising and reducing market competition and so innovation succeeding.


Users should be trained to research the domain or look for rating
site signatures that use public reviewing. It's a lot more effort to
fool these things, especially ranked on google than the cert levels
which actually reduce domain trust checking.


You don't walk into a shop and check it's a registered company and has
an accountant and then leave your cash on the table (EV) whilst you
browse the shop. There is more security in knowing where the shop is
and what the owner looks like and whether others trust him or the brand
(domain control).
_______________________________________________
dev-security mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security

Reply via email to