On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Nicolas Silva <nical.si...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, depends on what you call a layer tree. Currently a layer tree is > mostly a tree of intermediate surface that you render into, right? It's not > a tool describe the content you want to rasterize (with the exception of > color layers). > And ImageLayers... > Our layer tree is about where you rasterize content rather than how > (mostly). The gtk folks call the layer tree they are working on a > scenegraph (but honestly I wouldn't call it that) so I suppose we need to > be sure we talk about the same things. If a layer tree starts having things > like shape layers, text layers, etc. then it becomes closer to what I call > a scenegraph. > It's clear we could cleanly extend our current rendering approach with layers directly rendering more kinds of content. I'm keen to understand when and why this would be profitable. But I think that's offtopic for this thread. Rob -- oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo owohooo osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o o‘oRoaocoao,o’o oioso oaonosowoeoroaoboloeo otooo otohoeo ocooouoroto.o oAonodo oaonoyooonoeo owohooo osoaoyoso,o o‘oYooouo ofooooolo!o’o owoiololo oboeo oiono odoaonogoeoro ooofo otohoeo ofoioroeo ooofo ohoeololo. _______________________________________________ dev-servo mailing list dev-servo@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-servo
