On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Joshua Cranmer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1/10/2012 12:49 PM, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: >> >> Carlos Garnacho a écrit : >>> >>> We at Lanedo have been investigating search performance on the master >>> plain text copy of the code, which is at the moment performed reading >>> from file_index.txt line by line and matching on the search term. >> >> >> I think one useful thing for DXR would be to have some document about what >> the architecture is, the various steps and organisation, etc. >> >> I had no idea about that and I'm very surprised, why doesn't DXR use >> glimpse for this, like MXR/LXR did ? Maybe FTS with sqlite3 is just equally >> performant, but glimpse is the most natural choice when you just need full >> text search (and reg exps). > > > There is a note in the source code that points to a test that David Humphrey > did with respect to full text search; the current approach was an order of > magnitude faster than glimpse (IIRC).
This is documented here: http://vocamus.net/dave/?p=138 -Ted _______________________________________________ dev-static-analysis mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-static-analysis
