What, you never heard of the magic 5%? :)

But yes, this is a quite arbitrary number. I chose 5% because I guessed
that it would give enough leeway for even huge refactorings, at Mozilla
scale, but this hypothesis might not hold for small projects.

Cheers,
 David

PS: Hi :)

On 2/7/12 4:13 PM, Lionel Dricot wrote:
> This looks dangerous: what about the first indexing? What if you
> completely failed your first indexing? What if your code went through a
> heavy refactoring? (then, I assume, you could force the update
> nevertheless).
> 
> And then: why 5%? (note, it might indeed be a good solution, just trying
> to play devil's advocate here).
> 
> Lionel
> 
> PS: hey David, I think I've seen you from a long distance at FOSDEM but
> I was not able to say hello, too far ;-)
> _______________________________________________
> dev-static-analysis mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-static-analysis


-- 
David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD
 Performance Team, Mozilla

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
dev-static-analysis mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-static-analysis

Reply via email to