On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:23:53 +0100 Ben Bucksch <ben.bucksch.n...@beonex.com> wrote:
> On 15.01.2009 16:06, Johnathan Nightingale wrote: > > I see. And what if, given that the foundation is a small entity with > > few full time employees, they decided to contract out the management > > of the technical side of things to, e.g., the Mozilla Corporation? > > But the domain *owner* should be the Foundation. That would be the > correct reflection of reality. Well, if you really want to go as far as to want mozilla.org's owner to be MoFo, what do you say about the O= in the SSL certificate for *.mozilla.org? The O= is currently Mozilla Corporation, rather than Mozilla Foundation. ~reed -- Reed Loden - <r...@reedloden.com> _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
